ECLAC’s thinking. Towards an alternative development paradigm in a changing world

Contenido principal del artículo

Jennifer Castañeda-Navarrete
Rodolfo Canto-Sáenz

Resumen

Latin American structuralism, which had its intellectual epicentre in the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLAC), emerged as a critical response to orthodox economic paradigms in the mid-20th century. Despite its initial influence, the advent of neoliberalism overshadowed both structuralism and ECLAC’s policy influence. Over seventy years later, structural change and social equality remain pressing challenges in the region. This paper examines the evolution of ECLAC’s thought in the post-neoliberal era and its influence in policy making with a focus on four key areas: i) structural change and industrial policy; ii) equality and gender dynamics; iii) capital-labour relationships; and iv) the interplay between develop‑ment and nature. It offers recommendations for advancing an alternative development paradigm amidst contemporary transformations. 

Palabras clave:
neostructuralism, sociotechnical change, green transitions, gender equality, Latin America

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar

Castañeda-Navarrete, J., & Canto-Sáenz, R. (2026). ECLAC’s thinking. Towards an alternative development paradigm in a changing world. Problemas Del Desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana De Economía, 57(227), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2026.227.70512

Compartir en: