In light of what we have explained up until now, it is time to specify the difference between a geography of production and a geography of surplus.
This will allow us to identify a geography of production at the level of value production with its various quantitative and qualitative aspects. However, this does not conclude the analysis if the goal is to advance from a spatial perspective. On the contrary, this geography can be used to disguise the purpose of accumulation. For example, it can be used in the treatment of the "ideology" of industrialization through the regional promotion of projects subsidized by the State to the benefit of capital as a development factor in peripheral regions. In many cases, these subsidies do not imply anything else besides a monetary transfer to social subjects that would have made the investment with or without this support or implies increasing, without solid justification, the profit rate of the favored parties to the detriment of those that cannot access this promotion as they are located outside of the area promoted.
Now, from the perspective of power relations, what interests us is the value, and more exactly, the surplus depending on the moment in question. This is called geography of the surplus. What is meaningful here is the circuit of value and social and spatial distribution.
Thus arises the possibility of the spatial displacement (mobility) of the surplus as the necessary condition for spatial expansion, either in merchandise or monetary form, towards places that the appropriators/managers have decided to send it, either for their own direct appropriation or for (re-)investment. In these processes, conflicts surrounding space are intrinsically linked to social conflict regarding the production of value, surplus and its mobilization.
Using the critique of dominant thought as a starting point from which to contribute to designing a theoretical-interpretive framework through which we can address the social construction of the region by incorporation the behavior of social subjects that participate in it is a difficult, but inevitable, task if the goal is to build a discourse that influences the design of public policy and the entangled complex of social subjects involved in its conceptual basis, design and effective execution.
In the current international stage, where the capitalist mode of production is undergoing a crisis in its flexible accumulation regime, we must make progress in defining a theoretical-interpretive framework that supports a renewal/rethinking of concepts, new progress, content and proposals for issues related to specific national and regional needs. The traditional structuralism is under crisis with a theoretical-methodological framework to interpret the processes on the spatial level that brought about the crisis of capitalism in its current form and its repercussions on the global stage. It is now time to search for renewed theoretical perspectives upon which to build a fertile terrain for a superior perspective.
The theoretical-interpretive framework defined here for some of its significant elements hopes to contribute to a study whose dimensions might allow us to:
Published in Mexico, 2012-2017 © D.R. Universidad Nacional Autónoma
de México (UNAM).
PROBLEMAS DEL DESARROLLO. REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE ECONOMÍA, Volume 49, Number 192, January-March is a quarterly publication by the Universidad
Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán,
CP 04510, México, D.F. by Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas,
Circuito Mario de la Cueva, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán,
CP 04510,
México, D.F. Tel (52 55) 56 23 01 05 and (52 55) 56 24 23 39, fax
(52 55) 56 23 00 97, www.probdes.iiec.unam.mx, revprode@unam.mx. Journal
Editor: Alicia Girón González. Reservation of rights
to exclusive use of the title: 04-2012-070613560300-203, ISSN: pending.
Person responsible for the latest update of this issue: Minerva García,
Circuito Maestro Mario de la Cueva s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán,
CP 04510, México D.F., latest update: Feb 23th, 2018.
The opinions expressed by authors do not necessarily reflect those of the
editor of the publication.
Permission to reproduce all or part of the published texts is granted provided the
source is cited in full including the web address.
Credits | Contact
The online journal Problemas del Desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía corresponds to the printed edition of the same title with ISSN 0301-7036