Volume 43, Number 171,
October-December 2012
Russia: Strengths and Weaknesses
Arturo Bonilla
FINAL BALANCE ( ...continuation )

Likewise, because Russian territory is larger than any other powerful country, it has an enormous base from which to obtain material resources on a large scale.

Despite the setbacks that Russia suffered in the field of scientific research, it has begun to take up the reigns to advance in global competition in this area, for both civil and military purposes. This is one of the pillars it relies upon to maintain its status as a world power.

However, there are cloudy skies ahead for Russia in some areas: the country’s leaders feel that they have strong internal support and want Russia to have greater influence on the course of global affairs, which may imply that governments of other powers see these international actions as dangerous. This may foster conditions for probable confrontation, which would not be beneficial for any of the contenders, due to Russia’s enormous military power and massive annihilation capacity. There could be a situation in which prudence and mutual respect do not win out as they should. In October 1962, as will be recalled, the most serious confrontation between the two most powerful nuclear powers on the planet occurred: usa and the ussr, related to the installment of Soviet missiles in Cuba.

The other problem that Russia faces is the capitalist crisis that began in the United States in mid-2007. The enormous military power of Russia, the usa or any other nuclear power is useless in the face of the large number of complications and conflicts derived from instability, anarchy, competition and, for example, the risks of uncontrolled inflation, volatile exchange rates, poor management and sometimes involuntary fluctuations in interest rates, growing fiscal deficits of both nations and especially the unstoppable process of speculation growth, which is well above the meager growth of the global product. To summarize, military and nuclear power is useless in the face of the currently deepening and prolonged crisis, which could also have dangerous political consequences for world peace.

Because Russia is completely inserted into the global capitalist system, it cannot avoid the negative consequences of this incorporation. In the same vein and by way of conclusion, remember that when Stalin launched the first Five-Year Plan for the Soviet Union in 1928, spectacular growth followed, while the large capitalist powers were in the midst of debating as victims of the Great Depression of 1929-1933.


Claudio Quiroga, Gloria, “La despedida económica de la Unión Soviética,” Anuario Jurídico y Económico Escurialense, xxxix (2006)443/462/issn: 1133-3677.

De Andrés, Jesús, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (uned) and Rubén Ruiz, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (uned) in “Y Putin encontró el camino. Instituciones y régimen político,” np. 572, December 28, 2010 O “En la Rusia del siglo xxi”. See unisci Discussion Papers, no. 17, May 2008, issn 1696-2206.

Gorbachev, Mijail, Perestroika. Nuevas ideas para mi país y el mundo, segunda edición actualizada, Editorial Diana, Mexico, 1991.

Hernández Laos, Enrique, “Dentro de la Perestroika el futuro de la economía soviética,” at

Informe del Centro de Economía Internacional, Libertad y Desarrollo: “Rusia: urge una mejor institucionalidad política y económica,” in no. 572, December 28, 2010.

Indicadores y Sociales de la Federación Rusa, at www.cidob.org/es/.../file/Ru-sia_indicadors+economicosociales.pdf -Similares, p. 516.

pemex, Anuario Estadístico 2011, Comparaciones Internacionales.

Powaski, Ronald, La Guerra Fría, Estados Unidos y la Unión Soviética, 1917-1991, Editorial Crítica, Barcelona, 2000,
p. 9. (...). at http://historia1imagen.blogspot.mx/2007/06/historia1imagen_6271.html

Sánchez Andrés, Antonio, “La economía rusa: una década de transición,” in Revista cidob d’Afers Internacionals, no. 59, 2002.

Sánchez Andrés, Antonio, “La economía rusa en la crisis mundial: una valoración de la etapa Medvédev,” Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, no. 96, December 2011, issn 1133-6595,e-issn 2013-035x

sipri Yearbook 2010, Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, Spanish summary, p. 14.

Published in Mexico, 2012-2017 © D.R. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
PROBLEMAS DEL DESARROLLO. REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE ECONOMÍA, Volume 49, Number 192, January-March is a quarterly publication by the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, CP 04510, México, D.F. by Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Circuito Mario de la Cueva, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán,
CP 04510, México, D.F. Tel (52 55) 56 23 01 05 and (52 55) 56 24 23 39, fax (52 55) 56 23 00 97, www.probdes.iiec.unam.mx, revprode@unam.mx. Journal Editor: Alicia Girón González. Reservation of rights to exclusive use of the title: 04-2012-070613560300-203, ISSN: pending. Person responsible for the latest update of this issue: Minerva García, Circuito Maestro Mario de la Cueva s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, CP 04510, México D.F., latest update: Feb 23th, 2018.
The opinions expressed by authors do not necessarily reflect those of the editor of the publication.
Permission to reproduce all or part of the published texts is granted provided the source is cited in full including the web address.
Credits | Contact

The online journal Problemas del Desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía corresponds to the printed edition of the same title with ISSN 0301-7036