Volume 43, Number 171,
October-December 2012
Argentina and Brazil:
Macroeconomic Challenges
Eduardo Bastian and Elena Soihet

In summary, Brazil and Argentina took very different paths following their currency crises, and the objectives proposed by the respective macroeconomic regimes were at least relatively successful when considering the established priorities. In Brazil, inflation rates stayed at relatively low levels, while in Argentina, growth rates were high and industry recovered.

However, adopting these regimes also brought along negative effects. In Brazil, inflation led to currency appreciation that protected the Brazilian economy from the inflationary impacts of the high commodities cycle, but on the other hand, led to a process of reprimarization of the export pattern, exposing the country to the risk of deindustrialization. In Argentina, the stable and competitive exchange rate strategy prevented the use of currency appreciation as a protection mechanism against commodities inflation. As a result of this shock of increased commodities and due to salary increase pressure, inflation rates increased and today have provoked the real appreciation of the Argentinean exchange rate, threatening the principal pillar of the Argentinean macroeconomic regime.

In this context, these problems constitute challenges today for both the Brazilians and Argentineans. It will be necessary to make changes in the current paths of these macroeconomic regimes, because if these changes are ignored, the two economies will face more serious difficulties in the future. To summarize, the relative success of the first decade of the twenty-first century cannot conceal the need for future changes.


Amico, Fabian, “Argentina, 2002-2008: ciclo económico, inflación y crecimiento,” in Oikos, Year VI, no. 10, Río de Janeiro, 2008, pp. 33-51. ___, “Inflación de costos y conflicto distributivo en Argentina: un análisis de la etapa reciente,” in2do Congreso Anual de la Asociación de Economía para el Desarrollo de la Argentina (AEDA), Buenos Aires, 2010.

Azpiazu, Daniel and Martín Schorr, Hecho en Argentina: industria y economía, 1976-2007, Buenos Aires, Siglo Veintiuno, 2010.

Barbosa-Filho, Nelson Henrique, “Inflation Targeting in Brazil: 1999-2006” in Epstein, Gerald and Erinc Yeldon (ed.), Beyond Inflation Targeting: Assessing the Impacts and Policy Alternatives, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2009, pp. 139-157.

Bastos, Carlos Pinkusfeld Monteiro, “Inflação e Estabilização,” in Fiori, José Luís and Carlos Medeiros (org.), Polarização Mundial e Crescimento, Petrópolis, Vozes, 2001, pp. 201-241.

Bogdanski, Joel, Alexandre Antonio Tombini; Sérgio Ribeiro C. Werlang, “Implementing Inflation Targeting in Brazil,” in Banco Central de Brasil Working Paper Series, no. 1, Brasília, Banco Central de Brasil, 2000.

Bresser Pereira, Luiz Carlos, Macroeconomia da Estagnação: Crítica da Ortodoxia Convencional no Brasil pós-1994, São Paulo, Editora 34, 2007.

___, Luiz Carlos, “Taxa de Câmbio, Doença Holandesa, e Industrialização,” in Cadernos FGV Projetos, 5(14), 2010, pp. 68-73.

Câmara, Alcino and Matias Vernengo, “The German Balance of Payment School and the Latin American Neo-Structuralists,” in Rochon, Louis Philippe, Matias Vernengo (ed.), Credit, Interest Rates and the Open Economy, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2001, pp. 143-159.

Canitrot, Adolfo, “A Experiência Populista de Redistribuição de Renda,” in Bresser Pereira, Luiz Carlos (org.), Populismo Econômico, São Paulo, Nobel, 1991 (1975), pp. 11-36.

Cárdenas, Maurício, Eduardo Levy-Yeyati and Camila Henao, “Brookings Latin America Economic Perspectives,” Brookings Latin America Initiative, 2010.

Céspedes, Luis Felipe, Ilan Goldfajn, Phil Lowe, Rodrigo Valdés, “Respuestas de política a shocks externos en Australia, Brasil y Chile,” Economía Chilena, vol. 2, no. 2, 2005, pp. 7-44.

Cunha, André Moreira and Andrés Ferrari, “A Argentina depois da Conversibilidade: um Caso de Novo-desenvolvimentismo?” in Revista de Economía Política, vol. 29, no. 1, São Paulo, 2009, pp. 2-23.

Published in Mexico, 2012-2017 © D.R. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
PROBLEMAS DEL DESARROLLO. REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE ECONOMÍA, Volume 48, Number 191, October-December 2017 is a quarterly publication by the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, CP 04510, México, D.F. by Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Circuito Mario de la Cueva, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán,
CP 04510, México, D.F. Tel (52 55) 56 23 01 05 and (52 55) 56 24 23 39, fax (52 55) 56 23 00 97, www.probdes.iiec.unam.mx, revprode@unam.mx. Journal Editor: Alicia Girón González. Reservation of rights to exclusive use of the title: 04-2012-070613560300-203, ISSN: pending. Person responsible for the latest update of this issue: Minerva García, Circuito Maestro Mario de la Cueva s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, CP 04510, México D.F., latest update: Nov 13th, 2017.
The opinions expressed by authors do not necessarily reflect those of the editor of the publication.
Permission to reproduce all or part of the published texts is granted provided the source is cited in full including the web address.
Credits | Contact

The online journal Problemas del Desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía corresponds to the printed edition of the same title with ISSN 0301-7036