The Political Economy of Development,
Post-colonial Analysis and “Bad Samaritans”
Fernando López
FINAL REFLECTIONS ( ...continuation )

Theories of institutional development based on colonial origins have been questioned for their over-generalization of the historical factors cited, their limited empirical evidence, and because the interpretations underlying the imaginative econometric models are as arguable as the idea of “good” institutions.

Compared to the idea of the colony as an interim phase, postcolonial studies highlight the role of the colonial period and relate the colonial arbitrariness and postcolonial power in societies created by the violence inherent in the colonization. They offer an alternative reading of modernity, rebuilding the colonial narrative and its powers of fabulation; they also provide a biopolitical critique of European humanism and universalism.

In the case of Latin America, the most recent studies refer to the historic moment when states were born as being the point at which their eventual shape was defined. One idea holds for most of the analyses: the colonial logic, which went hand in hand with the industrial European capitalist expansion and development, remains to this day, despite formal independence.

Another criticism found in conventional literature on development derives from the detailed analysis of the historic experience of industrialized countries in their dual elements of “good government” and “good policies.” The outlook described is radically different from the reinterpretations of the past from a contemporary perspective. The conclusion is twofold: history contradicts the propositions of the dominant discourse, and recommendations given to developing countries on economic and institutional matters constitute an attempt to pull up the ladder to prevent them achieving progress.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abega, Severin C., “La violence endemique en Afrique”, in Le Bulletin de l’A.P.A.D., Association
euro-africaine pour l’anthropologie du changement social et du développement, no. 25, 2006.
Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, James A. Robinson, “Reversal of Fortune: Geography
and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 117, no. 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002, pp. 1231–1294.
__________, “Los orígenes coloniales del desarrollo comparativo: una investigación empírica”,
in Revista de Economía Institucional, no. 13, Bogotá, Universidad del Externado, 2005, pp. 17-67.
Aguirre, Mariano, “África: el debate sobre la crisis del Estado”, in Aguirre, Mariano and David Sogge,
Crisis del Estado y dominios civiles en África, Madrid, FRIDE, documento de trabajo no. 30, December 2006, pp. 1-11.
Albán Moreno, Álvaro, “El origen colonial de las diferencias del desarrollo entre países:
el neoinstitucionalismo e Hispanoamérica”, in Revista de Economía Institucional, vol. 10, no. 19, Bogotá, Universidad del Externado, 2008, pp. 235-264.
Alonso, José Antonio and Carlos Garcimartín, Acción colectiva y desarrollo. El papel de las instituciones,
Madrid, Editorial Complutense, 2009.
Álvarez Villaverde, Servando A., “América Latina: economía, Estado y sociedad en el siglo xxi”,
in Historia Actual Online, no. 16, Cádiz, Universidad de Cádiz, 2008, pp. 65-73.
Amin, Samir, “Capitalismo, imperialismo, mundialización”, in Jesús Seoane and Emilio Taddei
(comps.), Resistencias mundiales. De Seattle a Porto Alegre, Buenos Aires, Clacso, 2001, pp.15-30.
Anderson, Perry, El Estado absolutista, Madrid, Siglo XXI, 1984.

Arrighi, Giovanni, “Crisis africana. Aspectos derivados del sistema-mundo y aspectos regionales”,
in New Left Review, no. 15, May-June 2002, pp. 5-33.
Badie, Bertrand, L’État importé: essai sur l’occidentalisation de l’ordre politique, Paris,
Fayard, 1992.
Bairoch, Paul, Mythes et paradoxes de l’histoire économique, Paris, La Découverte,
1994.
Bardhan, Pierre, “Conflicts de distribution, action collective et Economíe institutionelle”,
in Gerard Meier and Josep E. Stiglitz (drs.), Aux frontières de l’économie du développement. Le futur en perspective, Paris, World Bank/Eska, 2002, pp. 225-241. 45 Economía política del desarrollo, análisis poscolonial y “malos samaritanos”
Bates, Robert H., Prosperidad y violencia. Economía política del desarrollo, Barcelona,
A. Bosch, 2004.
Bayart, Jean F., L’Etat en Afrique: la politique du ventre, Paris, Fayard, 1989.

Browitt, Jeff, “América Latina y el debate poscolonial”, Reseña a Moraña, M. Dussel, E. Jáuregui,
C. (eds) (2008), Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the poscolonial debate, Istmo, 2009.
Carmagnani, Marcello, El otro Occidente. América Latina desde la invasión europea hasta la globalización,
México, Fondo de Cultura Económica-Colegio de México, 2004.
Castro-Gómez, Santiago, “Geografías poscoloniales y translocalizaciones narrativas de lo ‘latinoamericano’”,
in Follari, R., and R. Lanz, (comp.), Enfoques sobre posmodernidad en América Latina, Caracas, Ed. Sentido, 1998, pp. 155-182.
Chabal, Paul, “Las políticas de violencia y conflicto en el África contemporánea”, in Revista Académica
de Relaciones Internacionales, no. 6, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 2007, pp. 1-17.
Chabal, Patrick and Jean Pascal Daloz, África camina. El desorden como instrumento político,
Barcelona, Ed. Bellaterra, 2001.